Leading women of Australia don't quite see their own ridiculous stance on the effect of rebellion and self centredness on our communities and theirs in particular :You may feel like being like the childish adults on Absolutely Fabulous, but you are wrong to not resist it; deeply and effectively.
It took Lumley and Saunders ( Lateline tonight) to remind the reactionary women's club at the ABC that nothing good can come from enjoying their indulgence and their well hidden love of acting like children and scratching, cursing and self centered cruelty that is so often there somewhere. .
Don't think many of the worshipers would realize that, to think like that was to pull yourself and your family down
.The ABC boys are allowed to do snide and innuendo with their tired old formula of wars on everything . Are the women allowed to do same ? Maybe they don't care if they end up like the boys- underneath ?
Why do we have to put up with the same same old tearing cynicism and innuendo,yes we are switching you all off because you are off ! Leading cynical sectors of ABC are running on plain hypocrisy and empty reactionary rebellion to any structure ---apart from their own. .How many grownups are there in there?
Joanna was at pains to point out that the "poor us sexism" that women on Emily's list play up to , is driving their own and their daughters into a go nowhere unreality. There is nothing there!
My bet is that noone in the pews is teaching their girls self control . One can only wonder, not how absolute fabulous are their homes , but how empty, vacuous and unhappy .Cruelty isn't part of the show ,only because the AF daughter has more sense than to follow her mothers lead . Are all the sycophants to AF as wise as the actors ?
Our daughters are being radicalized by their own mothers. Takes more than an Imam to generate a revolution . All it takes is failure - the empty nice denial of real evil by the reactionary modern secular age .
Australian Broadcasting Culture,and the ABC in particular, is too important to leave to some consensus amongst those inside about their favourite hymns and doctrines. Feel like an outsider when you don't take the current ABC worldview as a given - not on this site !
Monday, August 01, 2016
Monday, May 09, 2016
Judging faith on its ground effectiveness
Could be funny if it wasn't so ridiculous . The merchants of change in theory want us suddenly to believe they are interested in the sustainable. Jennifer Byrne on the book club talking on books that changed the world .
The only way a progressive can do this in the West with the bible and its grand literary and legal history standing in the decades of centuries is to claim , as they did on Book Club that pre biblical history had the idea before any Hebrew or Christian . More than a hint of denial there and only a catchphrase or token word like "the Iliad " to back it up ,
So, quite predictably we have the sycophants on her program dribbling out the doctrine using the Iliad aas the key - Just what we learnt from history is of course not an issue for a Jew or a Christian , We learn nothing from history , We are far more realistic and less prone to disappointment . Clearly as other members show the only alternative story of significance has to be a dystopian vision ( hunger games a) . The convenient dystopic vision at ABC of environment as disaster area is now a littel dated. ABC priests may believe dystopia talk can work cause their paid , whether it does or not , but young people will not -- Thank God
ABC breeds dystopian depression by preaching no other gospel
Faith in evolution ( so much part of this setup and stitch up program )doesn't work and its insertion into what is supposed to be a program about outsiders ideas becomes, as in any church a sermon on why the chosen authors agree with us .
So the biggest problem for this new faith in automatic progress and if you like " improving on Christianity crap " is that we need post christian ( more modern) authors to demonstrate this effect .
The constant faddishness in modern literature dissolves any credibility Jennifer Byrne tries to give to her assertion on THE BOOK CLUB . She is not helped by her guest who talks about The Hunger Games , All the presenters on the program don't realise that by asserting a progression, they should have on the ABC given the two millenniums of christina thinking far more independent and focused ( cf general) oxygen than they have for decades ,Enthusiasm for change characterises their attitude and the reason why the glass is for them ---still half empty ( and obnoxious to young people) .
We have told our young people that its a dog eat dog world - now they believe it and any reading of The hunger games that makes it nice is pure fiction - like their ambition to improve on a workable theory of human nature that the bible has taught consistently for centuries .
there are of course modern books that have changed the world but the reality is most people in modern times have never listened to build .
"The origin of the species" is valuable because it established the fact about natural selections role in adaption. It was one o those realities that deeply challenged not so much the authority of the Bible but the long held interpretation of it , You need something deeper than one chapter and its interpretation to ignore the Genesis story. The bigger question is do we still accept original sin as the framework for understanding the human condition - a best approximation ; or do we have another? .
Maybe Jennifer Byrne will have some one on next week to show us how she at least has moved on her understanding . Scott Peck Rollo May , Ronald Conway If she is right about natural progress there MUST be somebody whose ideas TRUMP those of a thousand years or so
Whatever happens Jennifer Byrne will have to be careful because the bible is clearly progress according to her theory - maybe she can identify how specifically we have moved on from it? - errors paradigms
Somehow I don't think she has thought it through .
As Herbert Spencer might admit if he were alive today " I invented evolution as the answer to everything" .but I know even Darwin, who work is tight on this would never let anyone let the idealism get out of hand --- Evolution and adaption happens , its not a universal principle of control in nature. Unless of course , you are stuck with your DNA as the final word in your lif.
The only way a progressive can do this in the West with the bible and its grand literary and legal history standing in the decades of centuries is to claim , as they did on Book Club that pre biblical history had the idea before any Hebrew or Christian . More than a hint of denial there and only a catchphrase or token word like "the Iliad " to back it up ,
So, quite predictably we have the sycophants on her program dribbling out the doctrine using the Iliad aas the key - Just what we learnt from history is of course not an issue for a Jew or a Christian , We learn nothing from history , We are far more realistic and less prone to disappointment . Clearly as other members show the only alternative story of significance has to be a dystopian vision ( hunger games a) . The convenient dystopic vision at ABC of environment as disaster area is now a littel dated. ABC priests may believe dystopia talk can work cause their paid , whether it does or not , but young people will not -- Thank God
ABC breeds dystopian depression by preaching no other gospel
Faith in evolution ( so much part of this setup and stitch up program )doesn't work and its insertion into what is supposed to be a program about outsiders ideas becomes, as in any church a sermon on why the chosen authors agree with us .
So the biggest problem for this new faith in automatic progress and if you like " improving on Christianity crap " is that we need post christian ( more modern) authors to demonstrate this effect .
The constant faddishness in modern literature dissolves any credibility Jennifer Byrne tries to give to her assertion on THE BOOK CLUB . She is not helped by her guest who talks about The Hunger Games , All the presenters on the program don't realise that by asserting a progression, they should have on the ABC given the two millenniums of christina thinking far more independent and focused ( cf general) oxygen than they have for decades ,Enthusiasm for change characterises their attitude and the reason why the glass is for them ---still half empty ( and obnoxious to young people) .
We have told our young people that its a dog eat dog world - now they believe it and any reading of The hunger games that makes it nice is pure fiction - like their ambition to improve on a workable theory of human nature that the bible has taught consistently for centuries .
there are of course modern books that have changed the world but the reality is most people in modern times have never listened to build .
"The origin of the species" is valuable because it established the fact about natural selections role in adaption. It was one o those realities that deeply challenged not so much the authority of the Bible but the long held interpretation of it , You need something deeper than one chapter and its interpretation to ignore the Genesis story. The bigger question is do we still accept original sin as the framework for understanding the human condition - a best approximation ; or do we have another? .
Maybe Jennifer Byrne will have some one on next week to show us how she at least has moved on her understanding . Scott Peck Rollo May , Ronald Conway If she is right about natural progress there MUST be somebody whose ideas TRUMP those of a thousand years or so
Whatever happens Jennifer Byrne will have to be careful because the bible is clearly progress according to her theory - maybe she can identify how specifically we have moved on from it? - errors paradigms
Somehow I don't think she has thought it through .
As Herbert Spencer might admit if he were alive today " I invented evolution as the answer to everything" .but I know even Darwin, who work is tight on this would never let anyone let the idealism get out of hand --- Evolution and adaption happens , its not a universal principle of control in nature. Unless of course , you are stuck with your DNA as the final word in your lif.
Sunday, April 10, 2016
ABC 's moral dilemmas too small and predictable
One of the clear consequences of ABC cloistering its worship around clever government is that the government is not so clever . You have to worship something and the object of their worship is thick.
The ultimate consequence of their decades long faith that government (and its ally -public opinion care) is that the volunteers and onlookers may stop caring as well . We pay them to care so let them get on with it - these institutions simply do not care very well without constant reform from the ground up . These institutes in cares name will dissolve out the care if they are run purely on material grounds. s .
Give us a break from G Doogue and Tony Jones whose predictable structure and patronising ignorance limits the discussion possible.
They have had their chance to lead - give someone else a go!!!!!!!
The only moral decision Doogue thinks is out there is 'assylum '. What about the rebellion of young people and the attractiveness of islam in the moral vacuousness they have created over the last 20 years ?
The ultimate consequence of their decades long faith that government (and its ally -public opinion care) is that the volunteers and onlookers may stop caring as well . We pay them to care so let them get on with it - these institutions simply do not care very well without constant reform from the ground up . These institutes in cares name will dissolve out the care if they are run purely on material grounds. s .
Give us a break from G Doogue and Tony Jones whose predictable structure and patronising ignorance limits the discussion possible.
They have had their chance to lead - give someone else a go!!!!!!!
The only moral decision Doogue thinks is out there is 'assylum '. What about the rebellion of young people and the attractiveness of islam in the moral vacuousness they have created over the last 20 years ?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)